Week 1 Assignment: Real-life Ethical DilemmasInstructionsExamine the case of Baby Boy Doe (Darr, 2011, p. 16.) The objective of this assignment is to get you to think critically about real-life ethical dilemmas and the moral principals involved. There is no right or wrong answer, just try to look at this case subjectively. Most of the time, resolving ethical dilemmas is not so "black and white." Discuss arguments for and against the issues below1. Discuss what makes this an ethical dilemma (read pp. 3 and 4).2. Discuss the implications of this study in terms of the moral principles described in chapter 1.Here are some questions that may guide your thinking:Respect for persons: Did the hospital/ physicians allow the parents to be autonomous in their decision-making? Do you see any elements of paternalism on behalf of the physicians?Beneficence: Did the hospital/ physicians act beneficently?Nonmaleficence: Did the hospital/ physicians consider nonmaleficence?Justice: Did the hospital act in a just way?3. Finally, do you think that the hospital did all that it could in this situation? Did it act appropriately? Explain.
Assignments are to be a minimum of 2 full pages of text and 3 reputable references in proper APA format.
Reference: Darr, K. (2011). Ethics in Health Services Management. (5th Edition). Baltimore, MD: Health Professions Press, Inc.
*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Assignment Instructions:
Please review the Weekly Assignment Grading Rubric prior to submission.
Make sure you read and understand the directions and requirements for each Assignment. Please ensure you cite your references in APA format with a minimum of 3 references (You may use your textbook as a reference and you should have a minimum of 2 academic outside references). Assignment will be graded based on the following areas: Foundation and synthesis of knowledge, application of knowledge critical thinking, writing skills, and organization of ideas and format. Refer to Library Online Resource Center for any research assistance. Refer to the Student Handbook for policies relevant to academic honesty and other procedures and policies related to this course. Assignments submitted late without advance notice will receive a 5% per day late penalty and will not be accepted for grading five (5) days past the due date.
” style=”display: block; overflow-wrap: break-word; overflow: auto hidden; text-align: start;”>
Examine the case of Baby Boy Doe (Darr, 2011, p. 16.) The objective of this assignment is to get you to think critically about real-life ethical dilemmas and the moral principals involved. There is no right or wrong answer, just try to look at this case subjectively. Most of the time, resolving ethical dilemmas is not so “black and white.” Discuss arguments for and against the issues below1. Discuss what makes this an ethical dilemma (read pp. 3 and 4).2. Discuss the implications of this study in terms of the moral principles described in chapter 1.Here are some questions that may guide your thinking:Respect for persons: Did the hospital/ physicians allow the parents to be autonomous in their decision-making? Do you see any elements of paternalism on behalf of the physicians?Beneficence: Did the hospital/ physicians act beneficently?Nonmaleficence: Did the hospital/ physicians consider nonmaleficence?Justice: Did the hospital act in a just way?3. Finally, do you think that the hospital did all that it could in this situation? Did it act appropriately? Explain.
Assignments are to be a minimum of 2 full pages of text and 3 reputable references in proper APA format.
Reference: Darr, K. (2011). Ethics in Health Services Management. (5th Edition). Baltimore, MD: Health Professions Press, Inc.
*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Assignment Instructions:
Please review the Weekly Assignment Grading Rubric prior to submission.
Assignments are due in the Assignment portion of the classroom by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. EST each week. Make sure you read and understand the directions and requirements for each Assignment. Please ensure you cite your references in APA format with a minimum of 3 references (You may use your textbook as a reference and you should have a minimum of 2 academic outside references). Assignment will be graded based on the following areas: Foundation and synthesis of knowledge, application of knowledge critical thinking, writing skills, and organization of ideas and format. Refer to Library Online Resource Center for any research assistance. Refer to the Student Handbook for policies relevant to academic honesty and other procedures and policies related to this course. Assignments submitted late without advance notice will receive a 5% per daylate penalty and will not be accepted for grading five (5) days past the due date.
Submissions
No submissions yet. Drag and drop to upload your assignment below.
Upload SubmissionYour browser does not support dropping files from your device.UploadRecordChoose ExistingYou can upload files up to a maximum of 2 GB.CommentsComments
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
The case of Baby Boy Doe presents a real-life ethical dilemma that requires critical thinking and consideration of moral principles. This assignment aims to analyze and discuss the ethical issues involved in this case and explore the implications of the study in relation to the moral principles outlined in chapter 1 of the textbook. By examining the hospital’s actions and decisions, as well as the principles of respect for persons, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice, we can assess whether the hospital acted appropriately in this situation. This analysis will provide a subjective understanding of the case without asserting a right or wrong answer.
Answer:
1. What makes this an ethical dilemma?
This case becomes an ethical dilemma due to conflicting values and principles. On one hand, there is a moral obligation to respect the parents’ autonomy and decision-making authority regarding their child’s healthcare. However, on the other hand, there is the duty of healthcare professionals to provide the best possible care and ensure the child’s well-being. The conflicting interests of the parents and the physicians create a situation where there is no clear and straightforward solution, making it an ethical dilemma.
2. Implications of this study in terms of the moral principles described in chapter 1:
a) Respect for persons: The hospital and physicians should have allowed the parents to be autonomous in their decision-making. Respect for persons entails recognizing the rights and dignity of individuals to make informed choices regarding their healthcare. However, it is essential to analyze whether the parents received adequate information and support from healthcare professionals before making their decision.
b) Beneficence: The concept of beneficence obliges healthcare professionals to act in the best interests of their patients. In this case, the hospital and physicians should have acted in a way that benefitted the child’s well-being. It is crucial to evaluate whether the decisions and actions taken by the hospital were driven by the intention to promote the child’s health and welfare.
c) Nonmaleficence: Nonmaleficence requires healthcare professionals to do no harm to patients. The hospital and physicians need to be assessed based on whether they considered potential harms and took appropriate measures to prevent them in the course of their actions.
d) Justice: Justice entails fairness and equality in the distribution of healthcare resources and treatment decisions. The hospital’s actions should be evaluated to determine whether they were fair and just, considering the available resources, the child’s condition, and the interests of all parties involved.
3. Did the hospital do all that it could in this situation? Did it act appropriately?
Assessing whether the hospital did all it could in this situation requires a comprehensive evaluation of the available information. Factors to consider include the hospital’s communication and support provided to the parents, the extent to which healthcare professionals considered the child’s best interests, the consideration of potential harms, and fairness in the treatment decisions. Only with a thorough analysis of these aspects can we determine whether the hospital acted appropriately in this ethically challenging situation.
