Hello there! Want a discount? Grab 5% OFFon your first order!
Hello there! Want a discount? Grab 5% OFF on your first order!

SEE ATTACHED HRA 562 – Compensation Project Scoring Rubric Name: ___________________________________________ Date:

SEE ATTACHED

HRA 562 – Compensation Project Scoring Rubric

Name: ___________________________________________ Date: _______________________

Students will complete the assignment with attention to the following criteria:

Rating Scale Exemplary: Corresponds to an A- to A (90-100%)

Proficient: Corresponds to B- to B+ (80-89%)

Basic: Corresponds to C- to C+ (75-79%)

Not Attempted: Corresponds to an F (0-74%)

Content Abbreviations:

IC = Internal Consistency

MC = Market Competitiveness

RA = Recognition of Individual Achievements

PS = Project Summary

Elements

Criteria

Score

(pts)

Not Attempted
(Criterion is missing or not

in evidence)

Basic
(works towards meeting

expectations; performance
needs improvement)

Proficient
(meets expectations;

performance is satisfactory)

Exemplary
(exceeds expectations;

performance is
outstanding)

Content

130pts

(65%)

IC 25pts

MC 40pts

RA 35pts

PS 30pts

□ Little to no evidence

of assessment,

synthesis/integration,

critical analysis, and

logical development

□ Writer addressed none

to some of the

requirements of the

assignment

IC: 0 – 18pts

MC: 0 – 30pts

RA: 0 – 25pts

PS: 0 – 22pts

□ More personal

assessment,

synthesis/integration,

critical analysis, and

logical development is

needed

□ Writer addressed most

of the requirements of

the assignment

IC: 19pts

MC: 31pts

RA: 26-27pts

PS: 23pts

□ Content shows

personal assessment,

synthesis/integration,

critical analysis, and

logical development

□ Writer adequately

addressed all

requirements of the

assignment

IC: 20-22pts

MC: 32-35pts

RA: 28-31pts

PS: 24-26pts

□ Content clearly

shows personal

assessment,

synthesis/integration,

critical analysis, and

logical development

□ Writer expertly

addressed all

requirements of the

assignment

IC: 23-25pts

MC: 36-40pts

RA: 32-35pts

PS: 27-30pts

IC ___/25

MC ___/40

RA ___/35

PS ___/30

____/130

Rough Draft

20pts

(10%)

□ Rough draft was not

posted by the end of

Module 7, and/or was

incomplete with few

or none of the

required elements

0 – 14 pts

□ Rough draft was posted

by the end of Module 7,

and was somewhat

complete with some of

the required elements

15 pts

□ Rough draft was

posted by the end of

Module 7, and was

nearly complete with

most of the required

elements

16 – 17 pts

□ Rough draft was

posted by the end of

Module 7, and was

nearly complete with

each required element

18 – 20 pts

____/20

APA

Formatting

25pts

(12.5%)

□ Little to no evidence

of appropriate APA

formatting

0 – 18pts

□ Appropriate APA

formatting throughout

most of the paper,

including title page,

paper layout,

references, and

citations with several

minor and/or some

major discrepancies

19pts

□ Appropriate APA

formatting throughout

the entire paper,

including title page,

paper layout,

references, and

citations with only a

few minor

discrepancies

20 – 21pts

□ Appropriate APA

formatting

throughout the entire

paper, including title

page, paper layout,

references, and

citations

23 – 25pts

____/25

Mechanics

25pts

(12.5%)

□ Scholarly format,

syntax, and

persuasiveness

substantially lacking

or absent.

□ Little to no evidence

of language skills,

substantial spelling or

□ Scholarly format,

syntax, and

persuasiveness used

somewhat.

□ Improvement needed

on language, significant

spelling or grammatical

errors.

□ Scholarly format,

syntax, and

persuasiveness used

most of the time.

□ Language is

professional, clear, and

concise, with some

spelling or

□ Scholarly format,

syntax, and

persuasiveness used.

□ Language is

professional, clear,

and concise, with

little to no spelling or

grammatical errors.

____/25

grammatical errors.

□ Little to no evidence

of flow.

□ Length requirement

missed substantially

0 – 18pts

□ Transitions are weak,

flow of the paper needs

improvement.

□ Paper fell just short of

length requirement.

19 pts

grammatical errors.

□ Transitions maintain

the flow of the paper

most of the time.

□ Paper is appropriate

length.

20 – 21pts

□ Transitions maintain

the flow of the paper.

□ Paper is appropriate

length.

23 – 25pts

Comments/Feedback: ____/200 pts

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

 For the first week’s discussion, you will refer to the illustration of the four phases of strategic planning: formulation, development, implementation,

 For the first week’s discussion, you will refer to the illustration of the four phases of strategic planning: formulation, development, implementation, and evaluation in Chapter 1, “Strategic and Workforce Planning”. Within the scope of the development phase, a difference is distinguished between a person who can create a strategy (someone

 This week, you explored different types of multiple relationships. Some multiple relationships are unavoidable and unanticipated, such as human services

 This week, you explored different types of multiple relationships. Some multiple relationships are unavoidable and unanticipated, such as human services professionals working in a rural community might have a neighbor as a client. However, other multiple relationships, such as developing a romantic relationship with a client should never happen. 

SEE ATTACHED **Cite textbook and outside sources. Strategic Compensation: Martocchio, J. J. (2020). Strategic compensation: a human

SEE ATTACHED **Cite textbook and outside sources. Strategic Compensation: Martocchio, J. J. (2020). Strategic compensation: a human resource management approach (10th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. ISBN: 9780135192146 Assignments: *****Imagine you are designing an incentive plan for your organization’s (or an organization of your choice) middle managers. Create both

SEE ATTACHED Please site textbook: Martocchio, J. (2020).  Strategic Compensation: A Human Resource Management

SEE ATTACHED Please site textbook: Martocchio, J. (2020).  Strategic Compensation: A Human Resource Management Approach (10th ed.) Pearson. and outside source: *Please response to both discussions below regarding the following case***views about whether discretionary employee benefits should be an entitlement or something earned based on performance. NG1…To determine whether discretionary employee